Research into the fixation stability of the glenoid baseplate in reverse shoulder arthroplasty / 中华创伤骨科杂志

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was proposed to deal with rotator cuff tear arthropathy in the 1970s and improved from 1985 to 1995 by Dr. Grammont who designed the contemporary type of reverse shoulder prosthesis successfully. The number of RSAs has grown rapidly over the past decade. Currently, the indications for RSA include, in addition to rotator cuff tear arthropathy, massive rotator cuff tears which can not be repaired, proximal humerus fractures or their sequelae, inflammatory shoulder disease, osteoarthritis with abnormal glenoid morphology, anatomic revision after failed total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty, and shoulder tumors. Absolute contraindications to RSA include infection, complete axillary nerve palsy, neuropathic shoulder arthropathy, and glenoid bone loss. At present, the stability of the glenoid baseplate, an important factor affecting the incidence of postoperative complications, is mainly achieved by implantation of the screws for the glenoid baseplate base. Therefore, correct implantation of the screws is of great significance to reduce the complications in RSA.

Two cases of bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis / Journal of Rural Medicine

Bilateral shoulder joint disorders caused by rheumatoid arthritis significantly impair daily functioning owing to a lack of contralateral compensation. In Japan, reverse shoulder joint prostheses were approved in 2014. This was expected to improve the surgical outcomes of rheumatoid shoulder arthroplasty. We report two patients with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty. This study aims to evaluate their postoperative clinical outcomes and activities of daily living. The patients were women in their 70s with stage III class 2 rheumatoid arthritis. Their treatment and postoperative activities of daily living were retrospectively reviewed. The first patient underwent the inlay type and experienced a residual limitation of external rotation postoperatively; therefore, she was restricted to dress with front-open clothes. However, she was able to undress after the lining of the garment was changed to a slippery material. The second patient underwent the onlay type and showed almost no limitations in postoperative activities of daily living. She was able to undress with an external rotation of 40–50°. Bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty improved range of motion, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association shoulder score, and functional outcomes. Only a few difficulties were encountered in the activities of daily living.

Clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of failed fixation of proximal humeral fracrtures in the elderly patients / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as a revision procedure for the failed fixation of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients.@*METHODS@#A retrospective analysis was performed on 8 patients with failed internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures from May 2014 to March 2020, including 3 males and 5 females, aged from 65 to 75 years old. All 8 patients underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and the mean time between initial fixation and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty ranged from 8 to 16 months. Range of motion(ROM), University of California at Los Angeles(UCLA) shoulder score, visual analogue scale (VAS), self-rating anxiety scale(SAS), and Constant-Murley score of shoulder function were assessed pre-operatively and at the last follow-up. Complications relating to the surgery were recorded.@*RESULTS@#All 8 patients successfully followed up. The mean follow-up after reverse total shoulder arhroplasty ranged from 16 to 28 months. The range of motion (forward flexion, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation) of the affected shoulder was significantly improved after surgery, and the post-operative VAS, SAS and UCLA scores were also significantly improved. For the Constant-Murley score of shoulder joint function, the total scores and the subscores of pain, daily activities, range of motion and strength test at the last follow-up were all significantly improved. Scapular glenoid notch was observed in patient, which was evaluated as grade 1 on imaging. All the other patients did not develop specific or non-specific complications.@*CONCLUSION@#Reverse total shoulder arhroplasty is an appropriate treatment as a revision surgery for failed fixation of proximal humeral fractures. It has shown satisfactory clinical outcomes, accelerating the rehabilitation of shoulder function and improving the quality of life.

Effect of tuberosity repair on functional outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures / 中华创伤杂志(英文版)

PURPOSE@#Unsatisfactory results of hemiarthroplasty in Neer's 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in elderly, have led to the shift towards reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The objective of our study was to repair the tuberosities that are generally overlooked during RSA and observe its impact on the functional outcome and shoulder scores.@*METHODS@#We include elderly patients with acutely displaced or dislocated 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures from July 2013 to November 2019 who were treated with RSA along with tuberosity repair by non-absorbable sutures and bone grafting harvested from the humeral head. Open injuries and cases with neuro-muscular involvement of the deltoid muscle were excluded. According to the tuberosity healing on radiographs of the shoulder at 9th postoperative month, the patients were divided into 2 groups, as the group with successful tuberosity repair and the other with failed tuberosity repair. Statistical analysis of the functional outcome and shoulder scores between the 2 groups were done by independent t-test for normally distributed parameters and Mann-Whitney test for the parameters, where data was not normally distributed.@*RESULTS@#Of 41 patients, tuberosity healing was achieved in 28 (68.3%) and failed in 13 (31.7%) cases. Lysis of the tuberosity occurred in 5 patients, tuberosity displacement in 2, and nonunion in 2. Mean age was 70.4 years (range 65 - 79 years) and mean follow-up was 58.7 months (range 18 - 93 months). There were no major complications. Group with successful tuberosity repair showed improvement in mean active range of movements, like anterior elevation (165.1° ± 4.9° vs. 144.6° ± 9.4°, p < 0.000), lateral elevation (158.9° ± 7.2° vs. 138.4° ± 9.6°, p < 0.000), external rotation (30.5° ± 6.9° vs. 35.0° ± 6.3°, p = 0.367), internal rotation (33.7° ± 7.5° vs. 32.6° ± 6.9°, p = 0.671) and in mean shoulder scores including Constant score (70.7 ± 4.1 vs. 55.5 ± 5.7, p < 0.000), American shoulder and elbow surgeons score (90.3 ± 2.4 vs. 69.0 ± 5.7, p < 0.000), disability of arm shoulder and hand score (22.1 ± 2.3 vs. 37.6 ± 2.6, p < 0.000).@*CONCLUSION@#Successful repair and tuberosity healing around the RSA prosthesis is associated with statistically significant improvement in postoperative range of motion, strength and shoulder scores. Standardized repair technique and interposition of cancellous bone grafts, harvested from the humeral head can improve the rate of tuberosity healing.

Resultados a mediano plazo de la prótesis invertida en la artropatía de manguito / Results in the medium long term of the reverse shoulder prosthesis in the cuff arthropathy

Resumen: Introducción: El estadio final de la artropatía de manguito (AM) genera dolor e invalidez, el tratamiento mediante artroplastía invertida (AI) muestra buenos índices de reducción de dolor y mejoras en movilidad. El objetivo de nuestro trabajo fue evaluar de manera retrospectiva los resultados a mediano plazo de la artroplastía invertida de hombro en nuestro centro. Material y método: Retrospectivamente analizamos 21 pacientes (23 prótesis) sometidos a AI con el diagnóstico de AM. La edad media fue de 75.21 años. El seguimiento mínimo fue de 60 meses. Analizamos las escalas ASES, DASH y CONSTANT preoperatorias y en la última visita de seguimiento. Se analizó la escala VAS preoperatoria y postoperatoria y rango de movilidad preoperatoria y postoperatoria. Resultados: Mejoraron todas las escalas funcionales y dolor (p < 0.001). ASES en 38.91 puntos (IC 95% 30.97-46.84); CONSTANT en 40.89 puntos (IC 95% 34.57-47.21); DASH en 52.65 puntos (IC 95% 46.31-59.0) p < 0.001; y 5.41 puntos (IC 95% 4.31-6.50) en VAS. Mejoraron con significación estadística la flexión (66.52o a 113.91o); y la abducción (63.69o a 105.85o). No obtuvimos significación estadística en rotación externa ni en rotación interna. Aparecieron complicaciones en 14 pacientes; 11 notching glenoideo, una infección crónica, una infección tardía y una fractura intraoperatoria de glenoides. Conclusiones: La AI de hombro representa una alternativa eficaz para el tratamiento de la AM. Puede esperarse alivio del dolor y una mejoría en la flexión y abducción del hombro; la ganancia en rotaciones es poco predecible.

Abstract: Introduction: The final stage of rotator cuff tear arthropathy generates pain and disability, treatment with reverse shoulder arthroplasty shows in different published studies good rates of pain reduction and improvements in mobility. the objective of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the medium-term results of inverted shoulder replacement at our center. Material and methods: Retrospectively, we analyzed 21 patients (23 prosthetics) undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the diagnosis of rotator cuff tear arthropathy. The average age of patients was 75.21 years The minimum follow-up was 60 months. We analyzed in all preoperative ASES, DASH and CONSTANT patients, and a new functional assessment was made using these same scales at the last follow-up visit. We analyzed pre and postoperative VAS as well as pre and postoperative mobility range. Results: We achieved a statistically significant improvement in all functional scale and pain values (p < 0.001). The ASES scale showed an improvement of 38.91 points (95% CI 30.97-46.84); the 40.89-point CONSTANT scale (95% 34.57-47.21) and the 52.65-point DASH scale (95% 46.31-59.0) p < 0.001. We found an improvement of 5.41 points (95% CI 4.31-6.50) on the VAS scale. We also achieved a statistically significant improvement in flexion values 66.52o to 113.91o degrees; abduction 63.69o to 105.85o degrees at the end of the follow-up. We did not get statistical significance in terms of external rotation but with a tendency to improve in the obtained values; instead in internal rotation we obtained results that showed a tendency to worsen. Complications occurred during follow-up in 14 patients; 11 in relation to notching glenoid, one patient with a chronic infection, one patient with a late infection and one intraoperative fracture of glenoid. Conclusions: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy. Pain relief and improvement in shoulder flexion and abduction can be expected especially; the gain in rotations is unpredictable.

Análisis comparativo de tres modelos de prótesis reversa de hombro basados en los nuevos ángulos de distalización y lateralización / Comparative analysis of three models of reverse shoulder prosthesis based on the new angles of distalization and lateralization

Resumen: Objetivo: Comparar resultados funcionales e imagenológicos de tres modelos protésicos según el índice de lateralización y distalización. En un grupo heterogéneo de diagnósticos (fractura, artropatía de manguito, secuela de fractura y artrosis glenohumeral). Material y métodos: Cohorte prospectiva de 33 pacientes sometidos a prótesis reversa de hombro entre Diciembre 2014 y Julio 2017 con un seguimiento mínimo de un año. Se definieron tres grupos, G: 10 pacientes con Grammont clásico (155o, Glena medializada); B: nueve pacientes con Bio-RSA (155o, glena lateralizada ósea); y A: 14 con Arrow (135o, glena lateralizada metálica). Las variables fueron: datos demográficos, clínicos, funcionales y radiológicos (ángulo de lateralización y distalización). Para el análisis estadístico se utilizaron pruebas de ANOVA, T-test y regresión lineal, con una significancia estadística de 5%. Resultados: El ángulo de lateralización del hombro (LSA) fue significativamente mayor en el grupo A (98o A, 79o G, 80o B) (p < 0.05). El ángulo de distalización del hombro (DSA) del grupo B fue significativamente superior al A (52o B, 39o A) (p < 0.05) y no significativamente superior al G (48o G) (p = 0.06). No se demostró una correlación entre el LSA y DSA con la rotación externa (p = 0.51) y elevación activa (p = 0.41), respectivamente. En índices clínicos (elevación anterior, rotación externa, rotación interna) y funcionales (índice Constant ajustado y evaluación subjetiva de hombro) no encontramos diferencias significativas entre los distintos modelos protésicos (p > 0.05). Conclusiones: El ángulo de lateralización fue mayor en el modelo Arrow y distalización en el modelo Bio-RSA. No encontramos correlación clínica-radiológica en esta serie heterogénea de pacientes.

Abstract: Purpose: Compare functional and radiological outcomes of three different designs of reverse shoulder arthroplasty according to distalization and lateralization shoulder angle, in heterogenic diagnostics (fracture, cuff arthropathy, fracture sequela and osteoarthritis). Material and methods: Prospective cohort of 33 patients of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) between December 2014 and July 2017 with a minimum one year of follow-up. We defined three groups, G: 10 patients with Grammont (155o, Medialized Glena), B: 9 patients with Bio-RSA (155º, lateralized bone glena) and A: 14 patients with Arrow (135o, lateralized metallic glena). We analyze demographic, clinical, functional and radiological outcomes (lateralization shoulder angle (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA)). For the statistical analysis, ANOVA, T-tests and linear regression tests were used, with a statistical significance of 5%. Results: The LSA was significantly higher in group A (98o A, 79o G, 80o B) (p < 0.05). In DSA, group B was significantly higher than A (52o B, 39o A) (p < 0.05) and not significant to G (48o G) (p = 0.06). There was no correlation of LSA and DSA with external rotation (p = 0.51) and active elevation (p = 0.41), respectively. There was no significant clinical (anterior elevation, external rotation, internal rotation) and functional outcomes (adjusted Constant score and subjective shoulder evaluation) differences between the different RSA models (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The LSA was higher in the Arrow and the DSA was higher in Bio-RSA. We did not find Clinical - Radiological correlation in this heterogeneous series of patients.

Reemplazo de hombro ambulatorio: Presentación de protocolo perioperatorio y resultados iniciales / Same-day discharge shoulder arthroplasty: Perioperative protocol and initial results

Introducción El reemplazo de hombro es efectivo para mejorar el dolor y la funcionalidad en patologías crónicas del hombro. Considerando los riesgos y costos asociados a la estancia hospitalaria, realizar este procedimiento de forma ambulatoria surge como una opción para optimizar esta estrategia terapéutica. Materiales & Métodos Estudio observacional descriptivo prospective de pacientes operados por un mismo cirujano con artroplastia de hombro ambulatoria (RHA) utilizando analgesia regional con bomba de infusión elastomérica. Se registraron las escalas de ASES y SANE, el dolor, la satisfacción del paciente, las complicaciones y reingresos a 90 días. Resultados Se intervinieron 10 pacientes de un promedio de edad de 59.6 (±3.9) años, siendo el 40% prótesis anatómicas, 50% reversas y 10% hemiartroplastia. Al cuarto día postoperatorio el dolor por EVA fue 1,3 (±0,62) y al décimo día 2,7 (±1,1). La puntuación SANE antes del procedimiento fue de 31 (±9,7), y 90 días después fue de 76,1 (±6,8). Todos los pacientes refirieron una alta satisfacción. Un paciente al 3er día presentó un episodio de broncoespasmo leve, tratado de forma ambulatoria. Un paciente presentó una infección superficial que mejoró completamente con el antibiótico oral. No se presentaron reingresos o consultas a urgencias a 90 días. Discusión Se presentan los desenlaces a corto plazo de la primera serie de casos en nuestro medio de RH ambulatorio. Este procedimiento puede ser realizado de forma segura, siguiendo un protocolo estandarizado y realizando una juiciosa selección de los pacientes.

Background Shoulder arthoplasty is an effective procedure to improve pain and function in chronic shoulder pathologies. Considering the risks and costs associated with hospital stay, performing joint replacements on an outpatient setting emerges as an option to optimize this therapeutic strategy. Methods A prospective analysis was performed in 10 patients undergoing same-day discharge total shoulder arthroplasty with anatomic and reverse prostheses. Pain was managed with a continuous peripheral interscalene block using an elastomeric infusion pump. ASES and SANE scores, pain, patient satisfaction, complications, and readmissions after 90 days were recorded. Results 10 patients (average age 59.6 (±3.9) years) underwent outpatient shoulder arthroplasty (50% reverse shoulder arthroplasty, 40% total shoulder arthroplasty and 10% hemiarthroplasty). On post-operative day 4, mean visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment was 1.3 (±0.62) and day 10, 2.7 (±1.1). Pre-operative SANE score was 31 (±9.7), and 90 days after the procedure was 76.1 (±6.8). All patients were satisfied with the procedure. One patient had a mild bronchospasm on day 3 that resolved with bronchodilators on an outpatient basis. One patient had a superficial surgical site infection that resolved completely with oral antibiotics administration. There were no re-admissions or major complications.

Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures in the aged: a meta-analysis / 中华创伤骨科杂志

Objective:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of hemiarthroplasty (HA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly patients.Methods:Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Chinese databases like CNKI, Wanfang Data and Weipu were searched for studies comparing HA and RSA in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly (>60 years) from 2000 to 2020. After the studies were included and excluded by a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria and evaluated for their quality, their radiological and functional data were extracted and analyzed using software Stata 14.0.Results:Included in this meta-analysis were 11 studies with a total of 771 patients. RSA was superior to HA in outcomes like forward flexion ( SMD=-1.043, 95% CI: -1.551 to -0.534, P=0.000), abduction ( SMD=-0.811, 95% CI: -1.470 to -0.153, P=0.016), Constant score ( SMD=-0.699, 95% CI: -1.118 to -0.280, P=0.001), American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons’ Form (ASES) ( SMD=-0.931, 95% CI: -1.256 to -0.606, P<0.001), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) ( SMD=-0.598, 95% CI: -1.181 to -0.016, P=0.044). HA led to a higher complication rate ( RR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.11 to 4.14, P=0.024), a higher joint stiffness rate ( RR=6.467,95% CI: 1.923 to 21.755, P=0.003) and a higher revision rate ( RR=5.796, 95% CI: 1.927 to 17.434, P=0.002). There were no statistically significant differences between RSA and HA in tuber healing rate ( RR=0.850, 95% CI: 0.669 to 1.080, P=0.182), internal rotation ( SMD=0.536, 95% CI: -0.394 to 1.466, P=0.259), external rotation ( SMD=-0.366, 95% CI: -0.916 to 0.184, P=0.192), implant infection ( RR=1.550, 95% CI: 0.330 to 7.286, P=0.579) or Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score ( SMD=0.286, 95% CI: -0.278 to 0.850, P=0.032). Although there was no significant difference between RSA and HA in visual analogue scale (VAS) score ( SMD=0.440, 95% CI: -0.113 to 0.993, P=0.119), RSA scored better ( SMD=-1.101, 95% CI: -2.090 to -0.112, P=0.029). Conclusion:For elderly patients (>60 years) with complex proximal humeral fracture, RSA may be a more effective surgical intervention which can lead to better early and mid-term clinical outcomes than HA.

Tuberosity Healing after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Is there Clinical Improvement? / Consolidação dos tubérculos na artroplastia reversa do ombro após fratura proximal do úmero: Existe melhoria nos resultados funcionais?

Abstract Objective To compare the functional results of patients with complex proximal humerus fracture submitted to total shoulder reverse arthroplasty with and without tuberosity healing. The secondary goal was to know the tuberosity healing rate after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with our surgical technique. Methods A retrospective, cohort type study, with a prospective database collection. In total, 28 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: age ≥ 65 years, reverse shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humerus fracture (type-3 or -4, according to Neer), and a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. At six months of follow-up, all of the patients were evaluated radiographically for tuberosity, and then they were divided into 2 groups: those with healed tuberosities and those with non-healed tuberosities. A clinical evaluation using the Constant score, active range of motion and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the last follow-up was also performed. Results Tuberosity healing occurred in 21 patients (76.3%). There were statistically significant differences in the Constant scoring system (p < 0.001), forward elevation (p = 0.020), internal rotation (p = 0.001) and external rotation (p = 0.003) when comparing the group of healed tuberosities with the group of non-healed tuberosities. No differences were found regarding the VAS score. Conclusion Tuberosity healing results in an improvement of the functional outcomes of patients submitted to reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

Resumo Objetivo Comparar os resultados funcionais entre pacientes com fratura complexa do úmero proximal submetidos a artroplastia reversa com tubérculos consolidados e tubérculos não consolidados. O objetivo secundário foi determinar a taxa de consolidação dos tubérculos com este tipo de prótese. Métodos Estudo de tipo coorte, retrospectivo, com coleta prospectiva de dados. No total, 28 pacientes cumpriram os critérios de inclusão: idade superior a 65 anos, prótese reversa do ombro por fratura complexa do úmero proximal (3 ou 4 partes, segundo Neer), e tempo de seguimento mínimo de 24 meses. Aos seis meses, todos os pacientes foram avaliados radiograficamente quanto à consolidação dos tubérculos e divididos em dois grupos: grupo com tubérculos consolidados e grupo com tubérculos não consolidados. A avaliação funcional realizou-se segundo o sistema de pontuação de Constant, da amplitude de movimento ativo, e da Escala Visual Analógica (EVA) à data da última consulta. Registaram-se todas as complicações. Resultados A consolidação dos tubérculos ocorreu em 21 pacientes (76,3%). Verificou-se diferenças estatisticamente significativas no sistema de pontuação de Constant (p < 0.001), elevação anterior (p = 0.020), rotação interna (p = 0.001) e externa (p = 0.003), quando se comparou o grupo dos tubérculos consolidados com o grupo dos tubérculos não consolidados. Não houve diferenças significativas na EVA entre os 2 grupos. Conclusão A consolidação dos tubérculos traduz uma melhoria dos resultados funcionais em pacientes submetidos a artroplastia reversa do ombro como tratamento de fraturas complexas do úmero proximal em idosos.

Two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treating postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of proximal humeral fracture / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To summarize the effectiveness of two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treating postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of the proximal humeral fracture. Methods: Between June 2014 and January 2018, 17 patients with deep infection and humeral head necrosis or bone nonunion after internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures were treated. There were 8 males and 9 females, aged from 52 to 78 years (mean, 63.8 years). The infection occurred at 19-66 months after the initial internal fixation (mean, 34.8 months). Microbial culture of joint fluid was positive in 14 cases and negative in 3 cases. The preoperative Constant score, American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were 36.41±8.65, 31.06±7.43, and 7.29±0.99, respectively. The preoperative ranges of forward flexion, abduction, external rotation were (45.88±12.46), (42.18±12.31), and (16.76±4.92)°, respectively. The preoperative range of internal rotation was buttock in 9 cases, lumbosacral joint in 3 cases, L 3 in 5 cases. At the first-stage surgery, the thorough debridement was done and the antibiotic-impregnated bone cement spacer was placed after the removal of internal fixation. After the infections disappeared, the two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was performed. The mean interval between the two procedures was 4.2 months (range, 3.0-6.5 months). Results: All the incisions healed primarily and no complications such as recurrent infection or vascular nerve injury occurred. All patients were followed up 15-32 months (mean, 22.0 months). At last follow-up, the ranges of forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were (109.00±23.66), (98.53±16.92), (41.41±6.82)°, respectively; and the range of internal rotation was lumbosacral joint in 5 cases, L 3 in 8 cases, T 12 in 4 cases. The range of motion of shoulder joints at last follow-up was significant improved when compared with the preoperative range of motion ( P<0.05). The Constant score (64.88±8.70), ASES score (65.18±8.10), and VAS score (2.94±1.25) were significantly superior to the preoperative scores ( P<0.05). X-ray films showed that no prosthesis loosening occurred. Conclusion: Two-stage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an effective treatment for the postoperative deep infection after internal fixation of the proximal humeral fracture, which has advantages of low risk of infection recurrence, good shoulder function, and satisfactory short-term effectiveness.

Artroplastia de resección de hombro como salvamento para infecciones recalcitrantes: estado actual de la técnica a propósito de dos casos / Shoulder resection arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for recalcitrant infections: current state of the art regarding two cases

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS La artroplastia de resección de hombro (ARH) se presenta como una técnica obsoleta y una opción no válida en la actualidad, debido a la evolución de las técnicas quirúrgicas y de los implantes. Pero, como consecuencia del aumento exponencial del uso de artroplastias de hombro, están aumentando en paralelo el número de fracasos e infecciones, con necesidad de revisión y rescate. Es por ello que, en determinadas situaciones y pacientes, esa técnica vuelve a ser una opción necesaria como salvataje, aunque tiene un alto coste funcional. El objetivo de nuestro trabajo, es presentar dos casos de artroplastia de resección de hombro como una opción válida de tratamiento en la actualidad y la revisión de la literatura. CASOS Se presentan dos casos de ARH como tratamiento de rescate, en un caso de osteomielitis crónica de cabeza humeral y un caso de infección de hemiartroplastia de hombro. Ambos pacientes se encontraban sin dolor y libres de infección con un seguimiento de más de 30 meses. En un caso la funcionalidad fue limitada con un Constant de 45 pero el otro caso la funcionalidad fue aceptable con un Constant de 67. CONCLUSIONES La ARH sigue siendo una técnica útil tras el fracaso de procedimientos de revisión, para resolver infecciones protésicas recalcitrantes u osteomielitis. Los resultados funcionales son pobres, por lo que debe reservarse para pacientes con baja demanda funcional y como salvataje, tras agotar otras opciones.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES shoulder resection arthroplasty (SRA) is currently considered as an outdated technique, due to the advances in surgical techniques and new prosthesis designs. However, with the exponential increase in the use of shoulder arthroplasties, the number of failures and infections is equally increasing, as well as the revisions and salvage procedures. In certain situations, SRA is therefore a necessary solution, although it grossly compromise shoulder function. The aim of our study is to present two cases who underwent SRA as a valid treatment option nowadays and a literature review. CASES We present two cases of SRA as salvatage treatment. First case in a chronic humeral head osteomyelitis and second in a partial shoulder prosthesis recalcitrant infection. Both patients had complete pain relief and infection was solved with a follow-up over 30 months. In the first case, postoperative shoulder function was limited with a Constant­Murley score of 45. In the second case, function was fairly good with a Constant of 67. CONCLUSIONS SRA remains a valuable technique after the failure of revision procedures, as a salvage for recalcitrant prosthetic infections or osteomyelitis. The functional results are poor, so it should be reserved for patients with low functional demand and as salvatage procedure, after assess other options.

Range of motion evaluation of the patients after total shoulder arthroplasty in Dr. Saiful Anwar general hospital: case series

The hemiarthroplasty is most commonly used after a fracture or musculoskeletal tumor of the shoulder where the blood supply to the ball portion (the humeral head) of the humerus is damaged. Since then, hemiarthoplasty has been used in many shoulder diseases including osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, cuff-tear arthropathy, and fracture sequele. Methods are authors evaluated 2 patients who had shoulder hemiarthroplasty on October 2017. The first patient is 53-year-old male, surgery due to primary bone tumor right proximal humerus suspected chondrosarcoma and the second is 72-year-old female with closed fracture dislocation of left glenohumeral joint after traffic accident. The patients followed up until 2 years and get routine medical rehabilitation on outpatients’ workup. ROM of shoulder joints which had operated evaluated 2 years post-operative. Results are First patient, active ROM extension is 20o, flexion is 10o, abduction is 30o, adduction is 20o, external rotation is 10o, internal rotation is 40o, while passive ROM extension is 150o, flexion is 30o, abduction is 110o, adduction is 40o, external rotation is 30o while internal rotation is 50o. Second patient, active ROM extension is 60o, flexion is 20o, abduction is 40o, adduction is 40o, external rotation is 20o, internal rotation is 60o, while passive ROM extension is 10o, flexion is 45o, abduction is 160o, adduction is 45o, external rotation is 30o while internal rotation is 80o. Conclusions are Careful and long-term post-operative care including Rehabilitation plays an important role in functional outcomes after Shoulder hemiarthroplasty.

Morphologic and morphometric analysis of glenoid cavity of human scapula

Background: To study the morphometry and morphology of glenoid cavity of dried scapula bone and in CT scan of glenoid cavity. The present study aimed at calculating three dimensions i.e. vertical diameter, horizontal diameter of the upper segment and horizontal diameter of the lower segment of the glenoid cavity and describing the incidence of its different shapes.Methods: This study was done on 100 dry, unpaired adult human scapulae of unknown sex. 50 scapulae belongs to right side and 50 scapulae belongs to left side obtained from Department of Anatomy, SRM Medical College and Research Institute. The above mentioned diameters are measured using Vernier caliper and the mean dimensions are calculated, morphological variations are studied. 3D CT images of scapulae, obtained from Department of Radiology, SRM Medical college and Hospital, Potheri, were also analysed.Results: In the current study, various dimensions and incidence of various shapes of glenoid cavity were measured. The incidence of both pear and inverted comma shape in right side is greater than in left whereas the incidence of oval shape in left side is greater than right side. The SI diameter of right glenoid is greater than the left, which is statistically significant. The Antero-posterior diameters (AP-1, AP-2, AP-3) of right glenoid is greater than the left, but not statistically significant.Conclusions: The knowledge of the above said variations of glenoid cavity is important in manufacturing the glenoid component of shoulder prosthesis, repair of Bankart’s lesion, procedures like posterior glenoid osteotomy.

Patient-specific Guides Using 3-dimensional Reconstruction Provide Accuracy and Reproducibility in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate whether the use of our novel patient-specific guide (PSG) with 3-dimensional reconstruction in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) would allow accurate and reliable implantation of the glenoid and humeral components. METHODS: 20 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used. The PSG group (n=10) and conventional group (n=10) was evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of implant positioning between before and after surgery on the computed tomography image. RESULTS: The superoinferior and anteroposterior offset in the glenoid component were 0.42 ± 0.07, 0.50 ± 0.08 in the conventional group and 0.45 ± 0.03, 0.46 ± 0.02 in the PSG group. The inclination and version angles were −1.93° ± 4.31°, 2.27° ± 5.91° and 0.46° ± 0.02°, 3.38° ± 2.79°. The standard deviation showed a smaller difference in the PSG group. The anteroposterior and lateromedial humeral canal center offset in the humeral component were 0.45 ± 0.12, 0.48 ± 0.15 in the conventional group and 0.46 ± 0.59 (p=0.794), 0.46 ± 0.06 (p=0.702) in the PSG group. The PSG showed significantly better humeral stem alignment. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSGs with 3-dimensional reconstruction reduces variabilities in glenoid and humerus component positions and prevents extreme positioning errors in RTSA.

Prognostic Radiological Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Korean Population

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), it is associated with relatively frequent complications and uncertain clinical outcomes. We investigated radiological factors affecting clinical outcomes of RSA in the Korean population. METHODS: We evaluated physical findings, radiographic findings, visual analog scale scores for pain and satisfaction, and several functional scores in 179 consecutive patients who underwent RSA at two centers between 2008 and 2014. RESULTS: In 146 included RSAs, pain and forward flexion improved with deltoid lengthening (average, 23.5 ± 9.1 mm; p = 0.039). External rotation decreased with medialization (average, 16.8 ± 6.0 mm, p = 0.025), whereas internal rotation showed no correlation with humeral retroversion. Scapular notching (n = 44, 30%) significantly decreased with greater inferior glenosphere overhang (average, 2.94 ± 3.0 mm; p = 0.001), greater prosthesis scapular neck angle (average, 104° ± 10.3°; p = 0.001), greater glenoid neck length (average, 9.8 ± 2.54 mm; p = 0.012), lower inferior baseplate tilt angle (average, 105.5° ± 9.2°; p = 0.009), and varus humeral neck-shaft angle (p = 0.046), and it did not affect ranges of motion and pain, satisfaction, and functional scores. At the final follow-up, medialization was related to improvement in pain and satisfaction, and inferior glenosphere overhang to functional scores. CONCLUSIONS: Proper amount of deltoid lengthening (mean, 2.3 cm) and inferior glenosphere overhang (mean, 2.9 mm) should be chosen for the better outcomes, while the center of rotation should be individualized according to patient characteristics in the Korean population.

Acute Displaced Fracture of Lateral Acromion after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Surgical Technique

Acromial fractures are well-documented complications subsequent to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and most appear as stress fractures with no history of single trauma. To date, no study has reported the occurrence of acute displaced acromial fracture due to sudden strong deltoid contraction during heavy work. Displacement of the fracture results in a challenging surgery since it is difficult to obtain adequate fixation in thin and osteoporotic bones. We report a rare case of acute displaced acromial fracture after successful RSA treatment, using a novel technique of open reduction and internal fixation, applying two 4.5 mm cannulated screws and lateral clavicle precontoured plate.

Is Acromial Fracture after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty a Negligible Complication?: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and clinical and radiological outcomes of treatment of the fracture. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify studies that reported the results of treatment of acromial fractures after RTSA. A literature search was conducted by two investigators using four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid Medline). RESULTS: Fifteen studies (2,857 shoulders) satisfied our inclusion criteria. The incidence of acromial fracture after RTSA was 4.0% (114 / 2,857). The mean age of the patients at the time of fracture was 72.9 years (range, 51 to 91 years). The mean time from RTSA to diagnosis of acromial fracture was 9.4 months (range, 1 to 94 months). One hundred shoulders (87.7%) were treated conservatively and 14 shoulders (12.3%) were treated surgically. The mean follow-up period after acromial fracture was 33.8 months. The overall union rate was 50.0% (43.8% for conservative treatment and 87.5% for operative treatment). The fracture incidence was significantly different among the medial glenoid and medial humerus prosthesis design (8.4%), the lateral glenoid and medial humerus design (4.0%), and the medial glenoid and lateral humerus design (2.8%). The mean values at final follow-up were as follows: visual analog scale score, 2.2; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 59.1; Constant score, 59.7; and Simple Shoulder Test, 5.8. The mean forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were 102.3°, 92.3°, and 25.8°, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acromial fractures after RTSA are a complication neither uncommon nor negligible. In the absence of studies with high-level evidence, there is a controversy on the outcomes after treatment. Further well-designed prospective randomized controlled studies with a long-term follow-up should be performed to ascertain the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of acromial fractures after RTSA.

Conversion of Failed Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Hemiarthroplasty: Three Cases of Instability and Three Cases of Glenoid Loosening

BACKGROUND: Glenoid loosening and postoperative instability are common causes of failed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). When soft-tissue problems or large glenoid bone defect interferes with reimplantation in revision RTSA, conversion to hemiarthroplasty can be considered. We present a case series of patients who underwent conversion to hemiarthroplasty due to glenoid loosening and early instability after RTSAs, along with clinical results. METHODS: A total of 72 primary RTSAs using the Aequalis prosthesis were performed at our institution from May 2009 to December 2016. Of these, five patients, including one with humeral neck fracture and absent rotator cuff and four with cuff tear arthropathy, underwent conversion to hemiarthroplasty. Another patient who had RTSA at a local clinic underwent hemiarthroplasty at our institution for unresolved postoperative anterior dislocation. The mean age of the six patients was 71.7 years (range, 62 to 76 years), and the mean follow-up period was 24.4 months (range, 18 to 30 months). Clinical assessments were conducted by using the visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score, and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score at the last follow-up. RESULTS: The conversion to hemiarthroplasty in the six patients dramatically improved the mean VAS score (preoperative, 8.1; postoperative, 2.5), ASES score (preoperative, 22.1; postoperative, 56.5), and UCLA score (preoperative, 12; postoperative, 18.1). However, the range of motion was almost unchanged after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to hemiarthroplasty can be a good alternative to revision RTSA in patients with serious complications (such as unresolved instability and glenoid loosening) difficult to treat with revision RTSA.

Outcomes of Bilateral Shoulder Arthroplasties: A Comparison of Bilateral Total Shoulder Arthroplasties and Bilateral Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients who underwent bilateral total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) for osteoarthritis (OA) versus bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs) for cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent bilateral TSAs for OA or bilateral RSAs for CTA with at least 2 years of follow-up. Twenty-six TSA patients (52 shoulders) were matched 2 to 1 with 13 RSA patients (26 shoulders) by sex, age at first surgery, and time between surgeries. Outcomes measured were shoulder range of motion (ROM), complications, and patient-reported scores. RESULTS: Preoperatively, TSA patients had significantly better forward elevation (FE) of both shoulders than RSA patients (dominant side [Dom]: 103° ± 32° vs. 81° ± 31°, p = 0.047; nondominant side [non-Dom]: 111° ± 28° vs. 70° ± 42°, p = 0.005) without significant differences in external (ER) or internal rotation (IR). Postoperatively, TSA patients had significantly better FE (Dom and non-Dom: 156° ± 12°, 156° ± 14° vs. 134° ± 24°, 137° ± 23°; p = 0.006, p = 0.019) and ER (42° ± 11°, 43° ± 10° vs. 24° ± 12°, 25° ± 10°; p < 0.001, p < 0.001) bilaterally and IR of their dominant arm (L1 vs. L4, p = 0.045). TSA patients had significantly better activities of daily living external and internal rotations (ADLEIR) scores (Dom and non-Dom: 35.3 ± 1.0, 35.5 ± 0.9 vs. 32.1 ± 2.4, 32.5 ± 2.2; p = 0.001, p = 0.001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (94.2 ± 8.4, 94.2 ± 8.2 vs. 84.7 ± 10.0, 84.5 ± 8.0; p = 0.015, p = 0.004), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores (93.5 ± 7.6, 93.8 ± 11.8 vs. 80.5 ± 14.2, 82.3 ± 13.1; p = 0.014, p = 0.025), with no significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores (0.4 ± 1.0, 0.3 ± 1.0 vs. 0.7 ± 1.3, 0.8 ± 1.2) bilaterally. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients with bilateral TSAs and RSAs exhibited improved ROM and patient-reported outcomes. Those with bilateral TSAs had better functional outcomes than those with bilateral RSAs.

Shoulder Replacement Arthroplasty after Failed Proximal Humerus Fracture / 대한정형외과학회잡지

Proximal humerus fracture can be defined as a fracture that occurs in the surgical neck or proximal part of the humerus. Despite the appropriate treatment, however, various complications and sequelae can occur, and the treatment is quite difficult often requiring surgical treatment, such as a shoulder replacement. The classification of sequelae after a proximal humerus fracture is most commonly used by Boileau and can be divided into two categories and four types. Category I is an intracapsular impacted fracture that is not accompanied by important distortions between the tuberosities and humeral head. An anatomic prosthesis can be used without greater tuberosity osteotomy. In category I, there are type 1 with cephalic collapse or necrosis with minimal tuberosity malunion and type 2 related to locked dislocation or fracture-dislocation. Category II is an extracapsular dis-impacted fracture with gross distortion between the tuberosities and the humeral head. To perform an anatomic prosthesis, a tuberosity osteotomy should be performed. In category II, there are type 3 with nonunion of the surgical neck and type 4 with severe tuberosity malunion. In type 1, non-constrained arthroplasty (NCA) without a tuberosity osteotomy should be considered as a treatment. On the other hand, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) should be considered if types 1C or 1D accompanied by valgus or varus deformity or severe fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff. In general, the results are satisfactory when NCA is performed in type 2 sequelae. On the other hand, RSA can be considered as an option when there is no bony defect of the glenoid and a defect of the rotator cuff is accompanied. In type 3, it would be effective to perform internal fixation with a bone wedge graft rather than shoulder replacement arthroplasty. Recent reports on the results of RSA are also increasing. On the other hand, recent reports suggest that good results are obtained with RSA in type 3. In type 4, RSA should be considered as a first option.